Wuxia Novelist: A Writer's Blog

Wuxia Novelist: A Writer's Blog looks at the broad range of issues encountered by me as a novelist working in the Chinese wuxia (heroic fiction) genre. I have, however, a very broad background and this blog will not narrowly focus on one genre of literature, rather I will consider books, movies, and ideas that relate to my life as a writer. For more information about my background please visit my author's website: www.thedragongateinn.com or www.facebook.com/WuxiaNovelist

Name:
Location: United States

Check out my author's website: www.thedragongateinn.com for everything you could ever want to know about me.

Friday, August 19, 2011

Wu Xia (2011) Film Review

How “Wuxia” is Wu Xia (2011)?

Director Peter Chan’s new movie, Wu Xia, was invited to this year’s Cannes Film Festival and has been touted by some reviewers as the revival of the wuxia film genre. Brad Brevet, in his “Cannes Movie Review,” however, is one of the few reviewers to question the genre of this genre titled movie:

Wuxia is actually a genre of Chinese fiction centered on martial arts with a hero at the center of its story that "fights for righteousness and seeks to remove an oppressor, redress wrongs, or to bring retribution for past misdeeds." You'd never guess that based on the detective story that makes up the first half of this film.

He goes on to point out that the, “The foundations of wuxia, however, are set in the early goings with references to such skills as Qinggong, Neijin and Dianxue…” But Brevet doesn’t look any deeper. And why should he, as he doesn’t have a background in the genre, citing Wikipedia as the source for his understanding. I would like to look at that issue in my consideration of Chan’s movie.

If you title your movie with the name of a film genre, then you would seem to be making a statement about the content of your movie. Does Wu Xia live up to its title? Not really.

While Wikipedia’s definition is fine for causal browsing – I don’t allow Wikipedia for formal references in my university course on this genre – we can drill down a little further. Most of my readers know that the genre name wuxia is broken down into two Chinese characters: wu, which relates to martial activities and xia, which is generally recognized to represent “chivalry.” But let’s be more specific, as in the West, “chivalry” brings to mind medieval European knighthood, damsels in distress, Christianity, and “courtly love” – none of which was present in the ancient Chinese concept of xia.

Note that I write “ancient,” for modern Chinese filmmakers have changed that – but that’s a rant for another blog. So what would work better than “chivalry” as a tentative translation forxia in the compound wuxia? I would offer “altruism,” which I understand in this context to be the opposite of “selfishness,” in the sense of “thinking first of the self.” Thus, a possible translation of wuxia could be “martial altruism.” Sounds like an oxymoron, doesn’t it! But it is easy to understand in a global cultural context if we think of heroes like Robin Hood and, perhaps, today’s “superheroes” who use their powers in defense of justice, etc. They are all altruistic heroes who “fight” for the “good” of humankind. With this little linguistic exercise in hand, let’s turn back to the movie Wu Xia.

There is little question that the hero, Liu Jinxi (Donnie Yen’s character), is “martial,” but is he altruistic? I would suggest that besides protecting his family (which we could understand as “selfish”) there are, at most, only two instances in the movie where he places himself in harm’s way for others: 1. In the paper shop robbery (and even here, some reviewers claim that Liu is only acting out of self-defense); 2. In the village square when it is being attacked by some of the “72 Demons” gang (which was brought on by his presence in the village). So the question for me is whether the Liu Jinxi character lives up to the appellation of xia – same character as inwuxia, but used as a proper noun to describe a “hero.” If he is not a xia, then where’s the wuxia in Wu Xia?

I’m not completely trying to be silly here, but am serious about how we define this genre. In the Chinese historical origins of this class of heroes, they were understood as personalities who “seeing an injustice on the road, pulls out his sword to help.” Further, early Confucian philosophers disdained them for valuing “personal freedom above family solidarity.” In other words, in the early xia tradition altruism was an equal opportunity value – you would help anyone regardless of family ties, and sometimes, in spite of those ties. How far we’ve come story-wise where the xia are frequently involved in love affairs and family matters – sells more tickets, and keeps those Confucian values of social stability well entrenched. There was a time in the 20th century when both the Republican and Communist governments banded wuxia movies as being dangerous for the country’s morals – but in those days the film industry was partly to blame for introducing blatant sexuality into the wuxia genre – to sell more tickets.

Back to our movie. I don’t find much wuxia in Wu Xia. The character with the most appeal – storytelling-wise – is not the main character, Liu, who is rather flat, but Takeshi Kaneshiro’s intriguing constable/detective, Xu Baijiu. And he is not a xia in the sense that he uses martial techniques to help others. Rather, he uses his brains to solve crimes and sort out his own life. In this, he actually has a character arc – rare in most “wuxia” movies that tend to obsess with the martial aspect. Detective Xu, rightfully so, is the most interesting character in this noir mystery tale.

As for the plot, a number of reviewers have pointed to David Cronenberg’s brilliant, A History of Violence as the template for the Wu Xia screenwriters. I made the “mistake” of following that clue and watching the movies back to back. It is clear that Wu Xia has A History of Violence as a model, but it is equally clear that in terms of storytelling the former can’t hold a candle to the latter. Cronenberg gives us a man and his family torn apart and stitched back together by a terrible “history of violence.” Wu Xia attempts and fails to give us the same. It fails at the storytelling level because the main character has little character, he is easily upstaged by the supporting character (detective Xu), the Lu family only gives us a shallow sense of the horror they are going through (compared to the family in A History of Violence), and the plot is so poorly conceived as to end, as reviewer James Marsh writes, “in one of the most staggeringly unnecessary examples of deus ex machina in recent memory.” Usually, when a writer has to resort to the deus ex machina “device,” it signals a lack of imagination. And that is what is so sad about such a beautifully shot movie.

The camera work and genuine Yunnan settings are fresh, new, and vibrant. The idea of introducing traditional Chinese medical understandings via detective Xu (who is miles beyond Tsui Hark’s Detective Dee) is innovative, but not original – see Guy Ritchie’s Sherlock Holmes(2009), which is probably not the first to use this interior body view technique. Donnie Yen’s fight choreography is great, especially the amazing scene with Kara Hui! The use of Jimmy Wang Yu as the villain (here’s where Wu Xia has one up on A History of Violence) is brilliant – he’s also far beyond the “hero” as a vibrant character. But once again, wuxia cinema is unable to sustain an overall coherent story – the villain seems to prove too much for the writer’s imagination. Wu Xia is not a wuxia genre movie. Rather, I see it as a stylish noir mystery.

No doubt, my understanding of the genre is fairly idealistic as I feel that the fighting should express some sense of altruism, a sense of forgetting the self in the support of others – not just one’s family, which is natural to most people. And, no doubt, this is drawn from both my study and teaching in my Boston University Writing Program course, “Paradox of the Hero/Heroine in East Asian Cinema and Fiction.” Where’s the paradox? As I understand it, these wuxia heroes represent the values of selfless equality in cultures that place the family before a sense of social equality. Traditional xia values transcend the local and the familiar for the universal and the other. In this sense, the traditional xia are still relevant to our globalized world. Now all we need are writers who can give this ancient tradition a contemporary appeal – or at least, film companies that can properly title their films!

Zaijian!

The Innkeeper

4 Comments:

Blogger John Dishon said...

Worst ending to a movie ever. And I agree with everything you said. It seems that these days, though, xia values are not required for a story to be considered wuxia. Many of them now are merely martial exploits + romance. Maybe there should be a genre split, and those kinds of stories should be called 武情 instead.

I also didn't really believe Liu Jinxi's conversion from thug to decent guy who wants to change. Just because that boy said "Brother"? As easy as that? It would have been more interesting if we had seen him struggle with his decision internally afterwards.

August 19, 2011 at 6:31 PM  
Blogger The Innkeeper said...

To see how such a story can be made to come alive, check out the movie, A History of Violence. Good to hear from you John.

August 19, 2011 at 7:09 PM  
Anonymous Miki2612 said...

First of all I have to apologize since English is neither my first nor even my second language.
I think I have to disagree because I found the ending to be highly enjoyable, it made perfect sense to me. Peter Chan uses a "device" in Wu Xia we know from the Ancient Greek theatre, the chorus. And yes, he uses "deux ex machina" at the end. To me that doesn't signal lack of imagination at all. It reminded me of Woody Allen's "Mighty Aphrodite", we have a chorus here too and a "Deux ex machine", a helicopter (!) at the end.
Second: Stephen Teo defines "xia" as follows, quote: "Thus the emphasis of the kung fu is on the martial arts while the emphasis of the wuxia film is on chivalry and the persuit of righteousness" 'Chinese Martial Arts Cinema', p. 4. He continues: "This implies that the nature of wuxia is more abstract and philospical in terms of its application of concepts such as chivalry, altruism, justice and righteousness (all of which come under the rubric of xia)" p.5.
Don't know, but I see I lot of xia in Wu Xia. And if a "deux ex machina" is a lame device or not depends on the context.

October 4, 2011 at 10:44 PM  
Blogger The Innkeeper said...

Hi Miki2612,

Thank you for your comment. I continue to stand by my comments regarding the movie and my interpretation of the xia - I still see altruism as the key. I used Teo book as textbook a few semesters ago. If I follow his point of view, Wu Xia is a kung fu movie.

October 5, 2011 at 7:24 AM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home